best time at track

[FATBLOCKMARO]

12.81 @ 113 two weeks ago :headbang1

[Feral]

Originally posted by 70novadose307
12.81 @ 113 two weeks ago :headbang1

It's in my sig. Hopefully next year I can break into the low 11's.

What you got for an engine? Juice?

[FATBLOCKMARO]

Originally posted by Feral
It's in my sig. Hopefully next year I can break into the low 11's.

What you got for an engine? Juice?


Its a 307 with aluminum heads

[igotasweetride]

14.01 :bash: @96-97:eh: the asshole gave me the wrong slip, thankfully people were watchin. i might get the time to go up before it closes and hit 13s before the season ends.:thumbsup:

[WETDRM]

well i have yet to have my current car to the track..., but my fastest ever at the track was in me black S/C 93 lx 11.2 @126

[igotasweetride]

Originally posted by GT200MPH
well i have yet to have my current car to the track..., but my fastest ever at the track was in me black S/C 93 lx 11.2 @126


blah blah blah, you dont own it anymore, so we dont care :flipoff1:

[Jcb890]

lol.

[X]

:owned:

[malibu81]

10.95 @ 121.2

[NickPSI]

You know what this thing ran at pomona?

I was always too scared to drive it.

[03COBRABOY]

13.78@99.74.....soon to be 12.xx@11x....

[timGT]

14.04 @ 99.7

:smokin:

[540Malibu]

malibu= 11.81 @ 118 (4 speed, smoked clutch 1.9 60ft)
11.84@114 (auto 2.0 60ft)

S10= 13.8 @ 118 (4 speed, street tires, valve float at 4700)
13.01@112 (auto, Drag radials)

2500HD= 15.9@87 (stock)

[M-bird]

NHIS Northchicane/South oval - 1:16.285 Hoosier R3S03 M3
Watkins Glen 2:21.455 Kumho Victoracer M3
Indianapolis Raceway Park 2:06.348 M5 street tires
Carolina Motorports park -M5 street tires - don't remember. sorry
Lime Rock Park M3 Kumho victoracer 1:03.843
Mt Tremblant M3 street car Michelin Pilot Cup 2:00.761
Memphis Motorsports Park M3 race car street tires 1:26.428

www.bmwccaclubracing.com
www.ner.org

I don't street race.

Epping May 2000 67 Firebird400 coupe auto 3.08 open street tires
13.759@101.xxx something or other. lots of wheelspin. big surprise

[Jcb890]

14.1 @ 98 or somethin like that.

[ThaSac (MicZic)]

15.1 @ 95.XX w/ a 2.6X 60 ft

but half way down the track my floor fell out when I hit my second shot of nawz....so I think I got more in her.

Zach

[nichols]

11.72 @ 122.7mph at the import event today. I backed it up earlier in the day with an 11.78 @ 121.x.

Too bad the season's pretty much over, now that the car finally came around. :eh:

Oh well.. there's always next year.

[Jcb890]

lol, damn nitrous and floors fallin out...u wudda hit 10s easy on that run Zach had that not happened:D :ban2:

that Camaro i had 2 race and that Lingenfelter that night were so sick tho.

[Igetlaidalot]

m-bird, whats up with your 67????we got another 68 and my 69 on here, fully representing the first generation firebirds, that would be a sweet picture to have!

[Brad S]

12.89 stock, no times with mods

[FATBLOCKMARO]

(FATBLOCKMARRO) 12.10 @120MPH SNAPPING PINIONS!!
.

[Slowhawk]

11.79 at 120mph on a 1.7 60'
ran 25 11,9's this year.

Time to get some real tires.

[MikeRizz]

11.35 @ 125, with a 1.58 60' time. The car has gone 128 MPH in the 1/4.

[F-Bobby]

16.3 with easily 100 pounds of crap in the car and a misfire. Ran it while beating my friends Lancer OZ that he talked to much shit about. It was a great sight seeing his headlights in my rearview. His first words when he got out of his car when he got back were "Shut up Bobby, Dont say a fucking thing" ijust laughed and walked away.

[tnthub]

11.86 at 112, but usually car runs in the 12.2 range at 108-109

[FATBLOCKMARO]

Originally posted by Slowhawk
11.79 at 120mph on a 1.7 60'
ran 25 11,9's this year.

Time to get some real tires.

I NEED TIRES BAD NOW

[92vr4ny]

13.1 @ 105.57 on stock clutch (1.8sec 60'), stock flywheel, tired engine, stock turbos, shitty tires, almost no tuning (back when I was even more clueless)

Now Kuris (Feral) has worked his magic on the car so should be much faster. It feels stronger now @ 13psi then it did at ~16psi back then. Plus I have lightened flywheel, upgraded clutch, "bigger" turbos, rebuild engine, few other parts already done, few more to come and some tuning by Kurtis when all is said and done. Hoping to be Low12's on pump or better. I want to be boosting around 19psi!

[irishboom]

Originally posted by GT200MPH
well i have yet to have my current car to the track..., but my fastest ever at the track was in me black S/C 93 lx 11.2 @126


So Don, does that mean my old man's/ my El Camino with the 427 / blower combo that ran a 10.3 at 147mph counts. HHHHHHMMMMMM???????:ak1:

[Chuckblvd]

Is this thread for current cars or past cars?

[igotasweetride]

Originally posted by Chuckblvd
Is this thread for current cars or past cars?


supposed to be current i believe, but don thought he was fuckin special. so feel free to post the fastest you've driven in anyones car, shit even if you were the passenger in the car when it was done :-/ :lol:

[Chuckblvd]

Alrighty! My Stang 3years ago Went 11.80s at 118mph. Until douchebag thew a needle bearing down the carb. cause she was pissed at me bacuase she left me Go Figue Whore. And I dont want to talk abuot the peice of shit I drive now.:smokin:

[igotasweetride]

Originally posted by Chuckblvd
Alrighty! My Stang 3years ago Went 11.80s at 118mph. Until douchebag thew a needle bearing down the carb. cause she was pissed at me bacuase she left me Go Figue Whore. And I dont want to talk abuot the peice of shit I drive now.:smokin:

do you go visit her grave often?

[Chuckblvd]

LOL That would have been so much easier:ak1: douchebag that lives on lake ave at the end of the 1/4 damn whore:shoot3:

[FAST4x4]

dee truck did 16.5@85mph

it had 33's 3.08's and about 400 hp man I miss driving it, I can list it because I still haveit, it don't matter if it moves or not lol

[WETDRM]

Originally posted by irishboom
So Don, does that mean my old man's/ my El Camino with the 427 / blower combo that ran a 10.3 at 147mph counts. HHHHHHMMMMMM???????:ak1:


small differance mike......I owned that car not my dad

[X]

But your dad did buy it.

[WETDRM]

Originally posted by DaRam
But your dad did buy it.



:eh: :thumbsup: so......:smokin:

[Chuckblvd]

Well christif were talkin boutparents cars. In 1976 my father had a 68 Camaro with a Linblad chassis, 454, auto, liftoff nose, fuel tank in the front, that went 10.30s (forget mph) He was runin rail cars and he went all over the eastcoast as far as I know it was a bracket car. The only reason he had an auto was cause he kept brakin muncie's.:P

[X]

:thumbsup:

[92vr4ny]

This is kind of related, but I was curious so I will ask it. Does anyone know what kind of G-Force you feel to achieve like a 1.8sec 60' for example?

[Mr Joshua]

need to hit the track next year, after getting new tires..
~J

[Shawn96VR-4]

12.89 @ 106.16MPH with BC @ 15PSI, leaking intake, BOV, DP, and my lead ass driving. :hmm:

Stock turbos/stock fuel

[327 vortec]

Originally posted by ThaSac (MicZic)
15.1 @ 95.XX w/ a 2.6X 60 ft

but half way down the track my floor fell out when I hit my second shot of nawz....so I think I got more in her.

Zach
I run a 15.2@89m.p.h.:smokin:

[tims]

Best and worst ... 13.2@106.8mph, 2.05 (shitty) second 60'

[Devin Mac]

14.8 @91 and change 2.1 60' street tires, in the now-deceased neon... R.I.P...

[92vr4ny]

Hey tims... what mods did you have when you ran that time?

[tims]

I had a typical BPU setup. ATR, borla, profec b, K&N. I recorded a peak boost of 14.5psi. I also had a full fuel setup - AN-6 lines, dsm 450's, hotwired supra pump, but that isn't really necessary with the stock turbo's at that boost. I really needed motor mounts and DS, because whenever I launched hard, I wheelhopped the shit out of it.

[92vr4ny]

I am curious what my car would have done on start turbos with proper tuning. :eh: I pulled a 1.8 with stuck clutch & flywheel and shitty tires and the car was sideways off the line. I had no egt or pocker logger and it was tuned by someone that is shady. So always wonder what I could have pulled out of it. But I managed a 13.1 @ 105.57 with not even a drop of race gas or any oct boosters. Shawn has some damn good times for his mods, he also has some good tuning. You live and you learn though!

[Shawn96VR-4]

I also weigh 310LBS. If Mike or any other light weight was driving and I turned the boost up to 17PSI, I would be one of the fastest 3/S in BPU-- form. :) I also only pulled a 1.8 60'. TypicalStateGuy (3SI member) is pulling LOW 1.7s and has seen 12.1 @ 112MPH riding the rev limited with BPU + ARC2 + 550C on stock turbos/clutch. Amazing.

For me, we shall never know because the turbos/fuel are being upgraded.

[Feral]

Originally posted by tims
I had a typical BPU setup. ATR, borla, profec b, K&N. I recorded a peak boost of 14.5psi. I also had a full fuel setup - AN-6 lines, dsm 450's, hotwired supra pump, but that isn't really necessary with the stock turbo's at that boost. I really needed motor mounts and DS, because whenever I launched hard, I wheelhopped the shit out of it.

I disagree ... I've found that cars running with a S-AFC can be a couple MPH faster than those without since the stock trim is so rich. Also 106-108 appears to be the limit of 360's.

[Feral]

Originally posted by Shawn96VR-4
I also weigh 310LBS. If Mike or any other light weight was driving and I turned the boost up to 17PSI, I would be one of the fastest 3/S in BPU-- form. :) I also only pulled a 1.8 60'. TypicalStateGuy (3SI member) is pulling LOW 1.7s and has seen 12.1 @ 112MPH riding the rev limited with BPU + ARC2 + 550C on stock turbos/clutch. Amazing.

For me, we shall never know because the turbos/fuel are being upgraded.

As I said above once you have a fuel computer of any kind you really change the equation and can get a LOT more power out of the car. The stock fuel trims are pretty rich (10:1 area under boost).

[Shawn96VR-4]

Originally posted by Feral
I disagree ... I've found that cars running with a S-AFC can be a couple MPH faster than those without since the stock trim is so rich. Also 106-108 appears to be the limit of 360's.

:thumbsup:

I run .96+ from 5K to redline. The S-AFC could help me lean the higher end just a bit.

Most BPU 3/S that I have seen trap anywhere from 105-108MPH. Adding the DSM 450/550cc allows any boost the stock 9Bs can carry. However, I have seen some not being that much faster because of the inability to tune.

-Shawn

[Shawn96VR-4]

Originally posted by Feral
As I said above once you have a fuel computer of any kind you really change the equation and can get a LOT more power out of the car. The stock fuel trims are pretty rich (10:1 area under boost).

2 - 13Gs
6 - RC 550cc
Supra FP
S-AFC V2
EGT
AF Meter
Gutting the precats
YOUR TUNING

Better net me 110-115MPH traps and 11.999999 on race gas! :)

[92vr4ny]

LOL, say you tell me I will prolly not hit 11's in the past, then post less mods and say you aiming for 11.9999 also! :bash:

[TunedPort 335]

I've yet to hit the track. I'd like to hope for mid 13's at around 101mph with good traction, but I'm gonna keep my mouth shut until it happens. And I'm gonna go after the Summer Nats, because if I went before the nats, with my luck something would break.

[Feral]

Originally posted by 92vr4ny
LOL, say you tell me I will prolly not hit 11's in the past, then post less mods and say you aiming for 11.9999 also! :bash:

Both of you will have cars capable of 11's but I wouldn't hold my breath unless you are willing to put in some 110 and force-shut your wastegates ...

[Feral]

Originally posted by TunedPort 335
I've yet to hit the track. I'd like to hope for mid 13's at around 101mph with good traction, but I'm gonna keep my mouth shut until it happens. And I'm gonna go after the Summer Nats, because if I went before the nats, with my luck something would break. Yeah that will be doable ... just practice driving is all you will need. I've seen those F-bodies cut 1.8 60's and if you can do that your car has all the torque you need to hit 13's no problem.

[92vr4ny]

I want to be very low 12's (or better, but prolly will not happen)with no race gas at all! Then I will not have the fastest 1/4 time, but the car already handles sickly and the brake mods shall be done soon! So it will be a great car all around, that few can compair in street trim all around.

[92vr4ny]

With my mods, how much of a difference would a cfds make for me?

[Shawn96VR-4]

Originally posted by 92vr4ny
LOL, say you tell me I will prolly not hit 11's in the past, then post less mods and say you aiming for 11.9999 also! :bash:

I highly doubt I will. I like to be realistic. I have seen too many DR500s say they are gonna run 11s like Monet and run 12.4-12.6 with every excuse in the world. :)

[Feral]

Originally posted by 92vr4ny
I want to be very low 12's (or better, but prolly will not happen)with no race gas at all! Then I will not have the fastest 1/4 time, but the car already handles sickly and the brake mods shall be done soon! So it will be a great car all around, that few can compair in street trim all around.

I have hit 12.3 on just pump gas. My best run on propane is 12.1. And 11.8 with race gas. My hairdryers are a bit bigger than DR500s or 13G's and I cut 1.7 60's all day. Keep your expectations realistic and ignore what everyone else has already done.

[Feral]

Originally posted by 92vr4ny
With my mods, how much of a difference would a cfds make for me? .1 seconds.

[tims]

Originally posted by Feral
I disagree ... I've found that cars running with a S-AFC can be a couple MPH faster than those without since the stock trim is so rich. Also 106-108 appears to be the limit of 360's.

Leaning out the high end could definitely improve speed a bit, the stock ECU for some reason seems to be mapped extremely rich at high revs, but not at 3-4k. In any case I don't think that I improved my time/speed with the safc, I was running .96v-.98v the whole run with 110 octane which probably slowed me down even more. I intended on running 18-20psi, but despite upping the setting on the BC, the highest I ran was 1.0bar (recorded peak on BC, and greddy P/H guage), I believe it was because my wastegates were too loose, and being forced open. Also on the highway run on the way back. 106-108 is probably right around the limit of 360's, you can definitely max them out with stock turbo's and the right mods. I also have found that on pump gas, I can not run leaner than stock (at 1 bar) without running into knock, I actually need to run a bit richer than stock at 2.5-4k.

[Feral]

Originally posted by tims
Leaning out the high end could definitely improve speed a bit, the stock ECU for some reason seems to be mapped extremely rich at high revs, but not at 3-4k. In any case I don't think that I improved my time/speed with the safc, I was running .96v-.98v the whole run with 110 octane which probably slowed me down even more. I intended on running 18-20psi, but despite upping the setting on the BC, the highest I ran was 1.0bar (recorded peak on BC, and greddy P/H guage), I believe it was because my wastegates were too loose, and being forced open. Also on the highway run on the way back. 106-108 is probably right around the limit of 360's, you can definitely max them out with stock turbo's and the right mods. I also have found that on pump gas, I can not run leaner than stock (at 1 bar) without running into knock, I actually need to run a bit richer than stock at 2.5-4k.

Yeah this is the same thing I have noticed. When tuning the high on a S-AFC I lean it out from 1000-2500 (spool) ... then richen it up till 4k ... then lean it out slowly to redline. This can give you a consistent O2 curve of around .94 if you do it right without knock.

[92vr4ny]

I have hit 12.3 on just pump gas. My best run on propane is 12.1. And 11.8 with race gas. My hairdryers are a bit bigger than DR500s or 13G's and I cut 1.7 60's all day. Keep your expectations realistic and ignore what everyone else has already done.

I know it will not be easy. 11's is my goal though. :worship2:

[bottledbird68]

Originally posted by Feral
Yeah that will be doable ... just practice driving is all you will need. I've seen those F-bodies cut 1.8 60's and if you can do that your car has all the torque you need to hit 13's no problem. I've driven one of those F-bodies to a 1.7 60ft on drag radials, it's more than possible :cool2:

[92vr4ny]

I would love to pull a 1.7 or better on street tires. Someone should donate LSD and CFDS to me, I will try and pull a 1.6!

[Feral]

Originally posted by 92vr4ny
I would love to pull a 1.7 or better on street tires. Someone should donate LSD and CFDS to me, I will try and pull a 1.6! I've hit 1.6 a few times with bald 245s and no special drivetrain equipment ... now I have 265's with tons of tread and I can wait to see what I can pull ... hehe.

[92vr4ny]

Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I would think a balder tire would do better at the track due to more surface area (bigger contact patch) where rubber means tarmack sp*

[Feral]

Originally posted by 92vr4ny
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I would think a balder tire would do better at the track due to more surface area (bigger contact patch) where rubber means tarmack sp* The contact patch was smaller on the 245s -17s than on the 265-18's. Also on radials (not slicks) the compound is really hard (300 treadware) so your traction sucks too. Compound this with the fact that the track is never truly clean or flat (all kinds of grooves and shit on the track) then unless you have hot-molten sticky tires you are better off with real radials that have some tread. The only reason why slicks are better is because you can get them sticky-hot and this overcomes the unevenness and dirtiness of the surface.

[92vr4ny]

What mods are coming next for this car? I want to see you at 11.5 or better this year! You think it will happen?

[Feral]

Originally posted by 92vr4ny
What mods are coming next for this car?

I dunno yet ... money is very tight right now. Probably just coilovers/swaybars/strut bars and a wideband O2 ... possibly a CFDS. Maybe over the summer I will begin the fuel system build up to support 1000+HP. Next winter it might see stage III heads with titanium valvetrain, upgraded cams, and solid lifters ... that might sneak me into the 10's.

I've nowhere near tapped the potential of it with 11.8 ... with some decent driving and tuning I am aiming for 11.5 and over 120mph this coming year. Or maybe my tired and abused engine will finally give in ...

[92vr4ny]

Did you see the other thread I posted about Wide Band 02? You may want to check that out.

Here is a link...
http://newengland-motorsports.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=732

Let me know what you think about it. I tried to show you last time but Alan on 3si was kind of a dick that day and deletd the post without telling me insted of just moving it or giving me a heads up at least.

[Feral]

I have several very large requirements for my wideband ... primarily is datalogging. Any guage or instrument is useless to me without datalogging. On top of that, the ability to replace my stock narrowbands would be nice ... so one with multiple inputs would be cool because I would use two sensors. I refuse to fuck around or be cheap when it comes to guages/monitoring ... to me they are more important than my turbos ... because inaccurate monitoring means a new engine if they are wrong ...

That said ... until I have the money and am serious I refuse to even look at the things. I am not a windowshopper I go into a store and buy what I want and then leave. No need to stand outside drooling until I have the money ...

[Devin Mac]

Originally posted by Feral
I have several very large requirements for my wideband ... primarily is datalogging. Any guage or instrument is useless to me without datalogging. On top of that, the ability to replace my stock narrowbands would be nice ... so one with multiple inputs would be cool because I would use two sensors. I refuse to fuck around or be cheap when it comes to guages/monitoring ... to me they are more important than my turbos ... because inaccurate monitoring means a new engine if they are wrong ...

That said ... until I have the money and am serious I refuse to even look at the things. I am not a windowshopper I go into a store and buy what I want and then leave. No need to stand outside drooling until I have the money ...

when you do have the money, and you start loking, there are a couple of wideband solutions that have a narrowband simulation feature, that sends a narrowband equivilent signal to your stock comp to keep it happy.

i know a lot of the neon guys have been using somehting along this line, in conjunction with a piggyback unit like the perfectpower smt-6, in order to retain stock comp functionality.

i'll get you more info when i have more time, tho.

[92vr4ny]

What is a ballpark figure for something like that?

[Feral]

Originally posted by 92vr4ny
What is a ballpark figure for something like that? They aren't too terrible ... maybe $100 more than the basic WB02's. I am looking at spending $500 for a single WB02 w/ datalogging and w/narrowband simulation ... and then probably just another $200 for the second O2 setup ... maybe less.

Regardless I am trying not to spend too much more on this car ... I would like to just pay it off (Owe about $12k on it between the car and the mods I financed) and then move onto my next platform sometime in the next 16 months ... my "WS6 of Doom" ... hehe. I don't expect the VR4 will be fully wrapped up before 3-4 years from now but I want lots of toys so I figure I should move on in the short term. The VR4 will be my road-race car and the WS6 will quickly and very easily become my sub 10 second drag race car ... hehe. I'm not fucking around this time.

[Devin Mac]

well, the otehr option is to go with somehting like an amt-6 piggyback unit, which will give you all kinds of control points, as well as good datalogging, and then just use whatever wideband you want to use.

i believe the smt can simulate narrowband output for the stock pcm to interpret, so it really is a good overall solution.

[Feral]

Originally posted by Devin Mac
well, the otehr option is to go with somehting like an amt-6 piggyback unit, which will give you all kinds of control points, as well as good datalogging, and then just use whatever wideband you want to use.

i believe the smt can simulate narrowband output for the stock pcm to interpret, so it really is a good overall solution.

I am unfamiliar with the AMT-6 ... is it a fuel piggy back? What do you mean control points? All I need is to translate the narrowband for my ECU/PCM/CPU whatever the fuck as well as datalog through RPMS over time so I can tune my fuel curve as need be. I already have a fuel computer and will probably be going with an AEM standalone within the next 24 months.

[Devin Mac]

Originally posted by Feral
I am unfamiliar with the AMT-6 ... is it a fuel piggy back? What do you mean control points? All I need is to translate the narrowband for my ECU/PCM/CPU whatever the fuck as well as datalog through RPMS over time so I can tune my fuel curve as need be. I already have a fuel computer and will probably be going with an AEM standalone within the next 24 months.

sorrt, meant to type smt-6

http://www.perfectpower.com/products/smt6.asp

[Feral]

Yeah I would rate that as overkill for my application ... lol.

[Devin Mac]

Originally posted by Feral
Yeah I would rate that as overkill for my application ... lol.

how so?

it's not really any more involved (or expensive) than a s-afc...

but you do get wideband support and datalogging out of it, which are things you want anyway. ditch the s-afc piece of shit, and go with a better solution.

[Feral]

Originally posted by Devin Mac
how so?

it's not really any more involved (or expensive) than a s-afc...

but you do get wideband support and datalogging out of it, which are things you want anyway. ditch the s-afc piece of shit, and go with a better solution.

I already have a fuel computer (well beyond a S-AFC) ... not going to buy another. I dont care how many gadgets and baubles a fuel computer has as long as I can pull an 11.5:1 from 2000-7300rpms this is all I need. My current fuel computer is capable of this I just need a wideband to do it without guessing.

[Devin Mac]

heh. ok. i thought you were using a s-afc for some reason...

ok. for anyone else that's looking for a good fuel management/datalogging/wideband solution.

of course, you could always build a megasquirt and really call it a day ;-)

[Flyin'A II]

Back to the thread subject of the thread, 15.01, spinning at the start, lifting too early at the end. Good thing I got a real job for food money, I'd be pretty thin on racin' winnings.

[Devin Mac]

Originally posted by Flyin'A II
Back to the thread subject of the thread, 15.01, spinning at the start, lifting too early at the end. Good thing I got a real job for food money, I'd be pretty thin on racin' winnings.

you got beat by a neon ;-)

[4doors]

Devin you need to take more weight out of your car.. :)

anyways, running a pcm tune for another guys diffrent cammed lt1, i went 13.70 at 103.5 in my 4200lb sled. Not too bad considering I have shit 3:73s behind my T56 trying to launch all that weight on street tires. 60 foot wasnt even worth mentioning.. 2.09.... I need to tune my car, put some slicks and go to 4:56s. Just that will put me in the 30's-40's. Nevermind if i take all my stereo crap out and pull the swaybar for weight transfer... Spring will tell... Cant wait to run it with the bottle...:thumbsup:

[FATBLOCKMARO]

Originally posted by 4doors
Just that will put me in the 30's-40's. Nevermind if i take all my stereo crap out and pull the swaybar for weight transfer... Spring will tell... Cant wait to run it with the bottle...:thumbsup:

30 - 40 second quarter miles thats not bad

[Jcb890]

lol.

[4doors]

If im good ill get it into the 20 second range.. I want to go heads up with a toyota prius hybird....lmao... :blush:

[FATBLOCKMARO]

Originally posted by 4doors
If im good ill get it into the 20 second range.. I want to go heads up with a toyota prius hybird....lmao... :blush: LOL

[Jcb890]

Run what ya brung man, hopefully that thing isnt runnin nitrous or he could edge you out :lol:

[mod313]

Best 60' and et in bracket trim: 1.48 and 11.23.

[igotasweetride]

Originally posted by mod313
Best 60' and et in bracket trim: 1.48 and 11.23.

holy shit, finally someone with a motor from reid's. do they sponsor you or you work there? i live over in abington, my friend lives right on the corner of old mansion and 27 right next to them. ive only seen a couple motors they built being installs but never saw the guys get them done and running. :thumbsup:

[mod313]

No, I don't work for them. But you do have to support your motor guy. I've been having them do stuff for me for about 20 years now.

[igotasweetride]

Originally posted by mod313
No, I don't work for them. But you do have to support your motor guy. I've been having them do stuff for me for about 20 years now.

nice, they do some sweet work. and if youve been havin him do motors since right after i was born, how old does that make you? lol :thumbsup:

[Jack ffr1846]

Lime Rock: 1:07.042 (SSA E30 M3)
NHIS N.chicane/S.oval (old course) 1:21.130 (same car)

don't remember others.....these are the easiest to look up.

[FAST4x4]

Originally posted by Jack ffr1846
Lime Rock: 1:07.042 (SSA E30 M3)
NHIS N.chicane/S.oval (old course) 1:21.130 (same car)

don't remember others.....these are the easiest to look up. dude, we're going this year.....see the Camaro in thesig?? it's getting a complete make over for road course :thumbsup:

[Jack ffr1846]

Cool, I'll be there this year in this:

http://www.geocities.com/levine18/noam500.jpg

Doesn't look like much, but is a second faster a lap than the M3.

[FAST4x4]

cool, looks like ya did a littel "rubbin" on the front drivers side :hmm:

[Shawn96VR-4]

TTT

[LS670ChevelleSS]

10.9 at 126... couldnt go any faster needed a lanyard for my bike....(99 tl 1000r) havent ran my car yet! hoping high 12s?

[383BackInBlack]

Originally posted by mod313
No, I don't work for them. But you do have to support your motor guy. I've been having them do stuff for me for about 20 years now.

reids built my motor......well the first time it was built anyways lol.

[383BackInBlack]

best ET 12.32 @ 114.shit

gone as fast as 116.shit though

[OVRBST]

10.88@138.6mph....then got booted :(

I would have edged your bike :thumbsup:
10.9 at 126... couldnt go any faster needed a lanyard for my bike....(99 tl 1000r

[SickboySS]

reids built this motor over 20 years ago...and yes, the wheels are up off the ground....8.90 supercomp, ran constant 9 flat...427 chev with crower-glide Th400 (Th400 w/clutch)... that was definitely a drinking team with a racing problem, i've heard stories...didn't break anything, so they all slept in the stands between rounds cuz they were so cocked by noon, haha

http://images.cardomain.com/member_images/12/web/264000-264999/264262_208_full.jpg